Commonwealth v. Brady
A 1986 Pennsylvania Supreme Court case allows prior inconsistent statements by a witness to be presented as substantive evidence in court, even over the witness’ denials. In other words, said R. Michael Cassidy, a former prosecutor and a Boston College law professor, “it’s up to the jury to decide whether they’re lying now or lying then.”
TV TIMES
en-us
2021-06-13T07:00:00.0000000Z
2021-06-13T07:00:00.0000000Z
https://edition.timesfreepress.com/article/283064122292568
WEHCO Media